Showing posts with label MNP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MNP. Show all posts

Monday, February 8, 2010

Telcos EBITDA margins to fall further by 5 to 10 per cent: Analyst


Outlook grim as tariff war rages, 3G delayed




Bhaskar Hazarika


Competitive pricing is likely to result in muted top line growth for telecom operators over the next four to six quarters. With per-second billing being launched by telcos, analysts foresee a further decline in average revenue per minute (ARPM), which has been a constant challenge for the industry. Analysts estimate that the revenues of telcos are likely to be stagnant and the earnings before income tax depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda) margins would fall further by 5 to 10 per cent.

According to a Fitch Ratings report, incumbent operators with stronger balance sheets and comfortable liquidity profiles would be stable, while the outlook for new entrants and public sector telecom operators is negative. “The revision in the outlook from 2009 is primarily due to stiff competition and a faster-than-expected decline in tariffs, which has had an impact on revenue and profitability. However, the credit profiles of all operators are subject to the event risk of 3G and broadband wireless access (BWA) auctions,” the report says.

3G auctions and the implementation of mobile number portability (MNP) will be key themes in 2010.

Entry of new players in the telecom space saw the introduction of aggressive tariff plans from September 2009, forcing incumbents to introduce per-second billing plan. Analysts expect competitive pressure to continue in 2010, impacting revenue growth and putting pressure on Ebitda margins.

Director of telecom of KPMG Romal Shetty said 2010 would be one of the more difficult years for telecom operators and a positive year for customers. He said that there would be further correction in tariffs that are likely to come down further.

“Ebitda margins will go down by 5 to 10 per cent. Revenues for operators may remain stagnant. In the short term, it will be a difficult market but there is huge growth potential in the long term. Tariffs of high-end services such as international roaming, value- added services and data services are likely to come down further,” he said.

He said this year, some consolidation in this sector is likely. However, the mergers and acquisitions would be purely based on spectrum acquisition. “Due to the delay in the auction of 3G spectrum, some consolidation is likely to happen. We could see telecom biggies looking at smaller players for mergers. Thirteen telecom operators is a large number. Ideally, it should be six to eight operators,” Shetty said.

The increase in voice minutes is not proportionate to the decline in tariffs, putting margins under pressure. Shetty said that to combat falling Ebitda margins, operators would soon look at a change in the revenue contribution from voice and data segments. He said that once data revenues increase to 20 to 25 per cent, the revenues would start showing positive overall growth.

Principal analyst of Gartner Kamlesh Bhatia said, “Hyper competition on tariffs would have a pressure on both top line, as well as bottom line for operators. We see this is a difficult year for the telcos because tariffs have already reached the bottom, but there could be some corrections. Declining tariffs are eroding the margins of telcos and operators are going to have a competitive year ahead.”

Executive vice-president of Telenor group and head of Asia region Sigve Brekke said that going forward, if low tariffs are to continue, margins for operators would be under pressure. “It has always been a challenge for operators as the average revenue per user (ARPU) have been witnessing a steady decline. Operators offer low tariffs and are successful in increasing the minutes of usage, as such the pressure on margins could be rectified. However, the industry is likely to see such fluctuations in the future before the sector witnesses any consolidation,” Brekke said.

Price-led competition intensified in the third quarter 2009-10, with major operators cutting tariffs aggressively during the quarter (switching to per- second billing from the previous per-minute system). Consequently, ARPM declined at a faster pace of 5 per cent 6 per cent quarter-on-quarter in 2009. Voice ARPM declined from Rs 0.75-0.85 in the first quarter of financial year 2008 to Rs 0.45-0.55 in second quarter of financial year 2010. Fitch expects ARPM to continue to decline in 2010 due to the addition of mainly lower-end incremental subscribers and expected further pricing pressures due to the entry of new greenfield operators. However, the rate of decline will be lower than in 2009 due to growing data revenues.

Fitch states that capital expenditure, as a percentage of revenue remained high in financial year 2009-10 for private telcos (an average of 55 per cent), on the back of increased network coverage in smaller cities.

Capital expenditure for financial year 2010 is expected to be lower, however for financial year 2011, it will be higher for the 3G licence auction winners, assuming the 3G licence fees and its subsequent rollout in financial year 2011 is implemented. The free cash flow (FCF) of major private telcos has remained negative since inception due to higher capital expenditure and financing costs, and this trend is likely to continue, except for Bharti Airtel, which is expected to generate mildly positive FCF in financial year 2010 and financial year 2011, excluding the 3G licensing outlays.

According to a Macquarie report, the ongoing tariff war is likely to cap any meaningful re-rating of Indian telecom stocks in the next six to nine months. “Recent tariff actions are likely to result in muted top line growth for next four to six quarters for the Indian wireless operators. In addition to the slowdown in top line, intense competition leaves little cost cushion — hurting the margins of these players,” the report said.

However, mobile number portability is considered only a modest risk, and revenue from 3G services is not likely to be significant in 2010.

This is due to the fact that the Indian wireless market is already predominantly pre-paid and has a high annual churn rate of 40 to 48 per cent. Increased retention costs would mainly relate to the post-paid segment, which only accounts for around 5 per cent of overall subscribers in India.



© Financial Chronicle

Thursday, January 28, 2010

BSNL & MTNL delay number portability in India

MNP unlikely by April

Bhaskar

What delays mobile number portability (MNP) in India? It is clearly seen that majority of private operators are ready with the implementation of the MNP in India, apart from the government PSUs --- Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL). This points fingers towards these two telcos for the delay.

A close source in the Ministry of Communications and IT has informed us that the both the PSUs (BSNL & MTNL) have been lobbying strongly against implementation of number portability in India. He said that both the PSUs foresee huge churn from their network once MNP is launched. “A large number of subscribers in the PSU network have been logged on to the network only to retain the number. Once MNP is implemented both PSUs are likely to feel the heat of subscriber churn,” the source informed.

This has already delayed the implementation of MNP in India by three months. However, this is unlikely that the MNP would be launched by April 2010.

© Time blog

Monday, December 21, 2009

Multiple SIM usage to impact top line margin for telcos


Bhaskar Hazarika & Sanjeev Sharma

New Delhi, December 20: The increasing usage of multiple SIMs will have an adverse impact on the revenue of operators in the long-term. With dual and three SIM phenomenon there will be a fragmentation in the minutes of usage on the operators.

According to a Macquarie report, “Subscribers take-up activity is becoming increasingly irrelevant, with dual and three SIM phenomenon increasingly visible. Minutes of usage fragmentation across multiple SIMs from different operators will pressure telcos top line.”

According to data from the Cellular Operators Association of India, GSM operators (excluding GSM SIMs for the two large CDMA operators Reliance Communications and Tata DoCoMo) added 11.1 million SIMs in November. In October the GSM operators added 10.3 million SIMs, 8.6 million in September, 9.3 million in August.

President of Indian Cellular Association, Pankaj Mohindroo said that there has been significant increase in the number of multiple SIM usage among the subscribers. “According to industry estimates the dual SIM card handset users in the market is around 25 million. If you take in to account the Delhi circle there are 25 million subscribers compared to the total population of 17 million. This clearly states that the number of SIM cards has surpassed the total population,” he said.

Chief corporate affair officer of Idea Cellular, Rajat Mukherji told Financial Chronicle that multiple SIM usage is witnessed predominantly in the circles where the tele-density is relatively higher. “The premium markets are witnessing the growth of multiple SIMs. However, there is a clear distinction between the voice and the non-voice segment. When an individual uses two SIM cards, he makes clear distinction in his usage pattern --- one for voice usage and the other for data, vas services,” he said.

Mukherji added that a lot of BlackBerry subscribers have their second phone, which is used primarily for calling. “Since the tariffs are already low for almost all the operators, we do not see any tariff arbitrage in this case. This is an industry wide phenomenon, which all the operators are likely to face,” he added.

Emails sent across to Vodafone, Bharti Airtel and Aircel did not elicit any response.

With cloud of uncertainty hovering over the mobile number portability (MNP), the consumer is left with no other option than to get an additional SIM card for his use. It may be noted that the existing SIM card continues to be under usage, only to retain the number. Mobile number portability was earlier slated to be launched on December 31, but has been deferred by three months. The operators have expressed their inability to launch the service stating that the implementation of the service is not complete.

© Financial Chronicle